Players Limit

Rino · Post by **Rino** » 28-01-2004 15:32

Just for the new Season, i think could be useful a new rulezZzZZz
about a max number of players each team, fixed on 10 dballers!
If everyone join Px or Deus how can we hope to see new clans? If u will introduce this players limit i think we can see new clans born.
DO it!

Requiem`` · Post by **Requiem``** » 28-01-2004 15:54

this problem was allready discuss and i think it's not a so good idea as far as u can find some teams with 10+ menbers who play together for a long time

what do u suggest?

to kick randomly 2 menbers?

mmm, no way

Post by **DavidM** » 28-01-2004 15:55

that, and 50% of these players are inactive anyway
makes no sense, really.

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 28-01-2004 16:31

DavidM wrote: that, and 50% of these players are inactive anyway
makes no sense, really.

Aye. Despite having 4 million members, we here at DEUS often struggle to find 5 players for a match.

Rino · Post by **Rino** » 28-01-2004 16:55

Originally posted by Onge
Aye. Despite having 4 million members, we here at DEUS often struggle to find 5 players for a match.

UHm... That's y i think we need some new rulez, another one could be a minimum number of matches you HAVE to play in a month, or u'll get a point penality...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$\o/$

Chubbs · Post by **Chubbs** » 28-01-2004 17:07

I think a player limit would suck. For many clans this would mean randomly kicking out a few members in a harsh way.

BurntLeaf · Post by **BurntLeaf** » 28-01-2004 17:35

lol, like gazman said ages ago, if we have to kick out members because of dbl rules, i'd take the choice of not playing dbl

ps: we only have 1 new recruit in ages, and all the others were in IR or UV squad, we just merged.

Hoju · Post by **Hoju** » 28-01-2004 18:51

well if anything like that was done there'd have to be a grandfather clause, but DavidM and Onge are right. RusH blue and red have about 10 on each and sometimes it's hard getting 5 for a match.

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 28-01-2004 20:45

Hoju wrote: well if anything like that was done there'd have to be a grandfather clause

Forgive my ignorance, but what is a grandfather clause?

Messy · Post by **Messy** » 28-01-2004 21:03

Santa's daddy's daddy?

Err..already discussed, answer: no!
Acquired number of matches to be played in specified time: no! this is the problem with the current league system anyway =\

Also, why do you insist to use a 'z' at the end of rulez? I don't see why

BlackFlame · Post by **BlackFlame** » 28-01-2004 23:15

ok i agree to disagree

NaB · Post by **NaB** » 29-01-2004 14:33

lol, next season..

as if

Cenotaph · Post by **Cenotaph** » 29-01-2004 15:03

NaB is a optimist ;p

he is right thou, this season was supposed to finish this weekend.... still most matches to be played...

Hoju · Post by **Hoju** » 29-01-2004 15:09

Onge wrote: Forgive my ignorance, but what is a grandfather clause?

grandfather clause is where if something existed then a rule/law/whatever was made to change that, all things that existed before the rule/law/whatever that would have been affected, aren't.

So, in this case, all teams with 10+ players currently would still be allowed to keep those players, but they wouldn't be able to add any more until they got to 9.

Nero · Post by **Nero** » 29-01-2004 17:15

1) such a rule is senseless
2) pX actually has 9 members added -.-