Last time....proposal

RaGe|DB · Post by **RaGe|DB** » 01-06-2004 09:55

Make a ingame ball camera
1. it adds alot for quality movie makers
2. It makes spectating alot of fun
3. the demos will win (if you spectate)

I know I've proposed this many times, but never got a straight answer...

btw. you should be able to look around 360 degrees

n00bs_own_Madogg · Post by **n00bs_own_Madogg** » 01-06-2004 09:55

"2. It makes spectating alot of fun"

or make you sick

(Intended for big screen owners)

why not fix the bugs first

BurntLeaf · Post by **BurntLeaf** » 01-06-2004 09:56

free moving, but a ball camera? O_o

RaGe|DB · Post by **RaGe|DB** » 01-06-2004 09:57

BurntLeaf wrote: free moving, but a ball camera? O_o

I mean free looking around, being able to turn 360 degrees

Twigstir · Post by **Twigstir** » 01-06-2004 10:05

As neat as it sounds, I think it wouldn't pan out in practice. I don't think it would be as smooth as you invision it. It would drive you nuts after a few minutes.

RaGe|DB · Post by **RaGe|DB** » 01-06-2004 10:16

Twigstir wrote: As neat as it sounds, I think it wouldn't pan out in practice. I don't think it would be as smooth as you invision it. It would drive you nuts after a few minutes.

We can't know till we try the real thing
basicly there are other camera's, if you don't want this one, you can choose another one

Post by **DavidM** » 01-06-2004 12:48

more whining aint helping
we have about 1000 things planed to do
but we have important things to do before we add a stupid ball camera

Messy · Post by **Messy** » 01-06-2004 18:06

Agreed, but it shouldn't be so hard to lock an extra spectator cam to the ball by default /o\

All the coding needed is the free-looking I guess >_<

Anyway, yeh ;p more important things

I guess

Post by **DavidM** » 01-06-2004 18:56

but we have about 100 small things like that
if i was a coder i would just do it, looks like a few lines
but it can take some time until i get my guys do this