Moderators: Jay2k1 , DavidM , The_One
Messy
Posts: 6334 Joined: 01-10-2003 14:37
Post
by Messy » 05-11-2004 22:19
Why? TFT sux ¬_¬
fb.shev
Banned
Posts: 1918 Joined: 17-03-2004 18:10
Contact:
Post
by fb.shev » 05-11-2004 22:22
SPEAKER SYSTEM WITH SOUND CARD
(ignore the shitass pc, im just gonna open it build it someday \o)
fb.shev
Banned
Posts: 1918 Joined: 17-03-2004 18:10
Contact:
Post
by fb.shev » 05-11-2004 22:45
Messy wrote:
Why? TFT sux ¬_¬
its not tft
Messy
Posts: 6334 Joined: 01-10-2003 14:37
Post
by Messy » 06-11-2004 18:21
Your new monitor..
..TFT.
I promise!
fb.shev
Banned
Posts: 1918 Joined: 17-03-2004 18:10
Contact:
Post
by fb.shev » 06-11-2004 23:36
it says LCD
i dunno, i thought LCD is different cuz its a liquid crystal display or summink, and tft was (something)flat transmission i dunno, it did say 17" LCD.. though i measured 19". and im using a 2048x1593 or summink resolution.. tbh 17" doesnt have that support
Messy
Posts: 6334 Joined: 01-10-2003 14:37
Post
by Messy » 06-11-2004 23:41
17" for the screen and 19" for the whole monitor?
Measure from a random corner to the opposite one.
And isn't a TFT (thin film transistor) actually an active-matrix LCD? ;p
^ google
fb.shev
Banned
Posts: 1918 Joined: 17-03-2004 18:10
Contact:
Post
by fb.shev » 06-11-2004 23:46
i dont care \o its just weird i can get that reso on a 17"
yeah its 18.5" to be exact
-plær-
Posts: 757 Joined: 18-05-2003 14:03
Contact:
Post
by -plær- » 07-11-2004 11:19
nowt wrong with modern TFT screens moshy. Ghosting is a thing of the past, as most new ones are <20ms response rate
Messy
Posts: 6334 Joined: 01-10-2003 14:37
Post
by Messy » 07-11-2004 15:32
Really?
Ok I guess that's pretty cool
StRaFe
Posts: 403 Joined: 27-11-2003 12:46
Post
by StRaFe » 14-12-2004 11:02
Sorry shev, what graphics card are you running?
fb.shev
Banned
Posts: 1918 Joined: 17-03-2004 18:10
Contact:
Post
by fb.shev » 14-12-2004 16:38
fx5700 (got for £50 and far cry)
i gave the 5200SE to my dad
(signature)