Deathball in ut2004

Post by **DavidM** » 31-05-2003 14:20

actually i only see ppl complaining that it has by far not enough content and is rather a mappack than a new game

whatever x_X

cajuncook · Post by **cajuncook** » 31-05-2003 15:53

Bot_40 wrote: This prolly translates to "We got enough content in UT2k4 to make people buy it, we want to keep the rest for UT2k5 so we can rape people out of more of their cash"

Hopefully they'll have a new engine by late 2004.

Or hopefully not. :\

Post by **DavidM** » 31-05-2003 15:55

only the lighting in the current engine sucks
for the rest we are not even close to what can be done with it

Surge · Post by **Surge** » 31-05-2003 17:50

^ for once i agree with David

the Unreal Engine is what made Splinter Cell and most people that play that say it blows away UT2003's graphics even tho they were made on the exact same engine.

UT2003 IMO was a half ass effort on Epic's part, but still better than most current FPS games graphically. Now that the others are catching up and HL2 and Doom III will totally waste UT2003 they need to beef up the game and will probably just enhance the overall look of UT2004 to try and make it at par with the other releases even though its being build on the soon-to-be inferior gaming engine.

Post by **DavidM** » 31-05-2003 18:39

splinter cell's lighting is weird too

max payne's seems by far the best, tho its not good with dynamic things

Surge · Post by **Surge** » 31-05-2003 22:36

may payne doesnt use the unreal engine i dont believe...

i know some of the stuff in Enter the Matrix looks sorta fucked up and thats on the same engine as Max Payne.

Post by **DavidM** » 31-05-2003 22:38

enter the matrix is a crappy comercial game, only supposed to make money, it cannot be good x_X

nobody said max payne uses the unreal engine... if it did it wouldnt look so good lighting wise

the radiosity rules, unreal doesnt even get close with the piss poor vertex lighting 0_o

YoYo789 · Post by **YoYo789** » 01-06-2003 03:19

DavidM wrote: enter the matrix is a crappy comercial game, only supposed to make money, it cannot be good x_X

How many games aren't made to make money? (apart from db of course

)

Diab · Post by **Diab** » 01-06-2003 09:12

if you cannot manage to get db into 2k4, what about somewhere in 2k4 advertising deathball? sure they can do that somewhere..

advert in map? maby in the news section when you log online. ehe

Post by **DavidM** » 01-06-2003 09:29

suggest that to them

" How many games aren't made to make money?"

yeah sure, but these kind of games overdo it

YoYo789 · Post by **YoYo789** » 01-06-2003 11:02

lol yeah, i know what u mean. anyone remember podracer??

Post by **DavidM** » 01-06-2003 11:04

podracer?

i only remember P.O.D.
was a great racing game at that time

MelvinB · Post by **MelvinB** » 01-06-2003 11:40

DavidM wrote: podracer?

i only remember P.O.D.
was a great racing game at that time

lol, fucking stunning lights.

SplinterCell totally sux, but i like the lightning and stuff. Max Payne en ETM sux also. Raven Shield has great lightning too, but again, it sux.

I don't like realistic, sneaky games. It's to slow and boring.

Pretty offtopic huh?

Maegrim · Post by **Maegrim** » 01-06-2003 14:54

max payne was very cool, especially with the kung-fu mod

Surge · Post by **Surge** » 01-06-2003 21:56

Maeg thats what ETM is basically... bullet time + matrix moves = eye-candy pwnage.