Warfare is...

CeeBeeUK · Post by **CeeBeeUK** » 01-11-2003 22:28

...buggy as hell, why wern't the wider public testing until this release.

I have just sat through 20 mins of connecting to a server mid-match and waiting for the next round to start and not spawning.

Reconnect, wait for the next round to start, and not spawning.

To be honest the few matches I have been in I have enjoyed but if it takes 20 mins to get in to a game where the round last 5 mins, stuff it.

Diab · Post by **Diab** » 01-11-2003 22:39

i been ok with the spawning so far, just make sure you click and dont expect a auto spawn before a game.

YoYo789 · Post by **YoYo789** » 01-11-2003 23:48

Warfare is buggy as hell because its a beta. Hopefully they were aware of the problems, but they probably haven't had time to fix them.

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 02-11-2003 00:50

1.9 is buggy generally...But I've had no trouble with dbw. Just don't try it with bots!

Rens2Sea · Post by **Rens2Sea** » 02-11-2003 00:52

YoYo789 wrote: Warfare is buggy as hell because its a beta. Hopefully they were aware of the problems, but they probably haven't had time to fix them.

What he said

YoYo789 · Post by **YoYo789** » 02-11-2003 01:10

Anyway, warfare is the greatest game ever made (or will be when less buggy). I was playing with a ping of 400ms this morning, and it didn't affect it one single little bit. A DBW league would not require location boundaries!

Sina · Post by **Sina** » 02-11-2003 01:34

its good for 1on1

Goldeneye · Post by **Goldeneye** » 02-11-2003 01:37

YoYo789 wrote: Anyway, warfare is the greatest game ever made (or will be when less buggy). I was playing with a ping of 400ms this morning, and it didn't affect it one single little bit. A DBW league would not require location boundaries!

yah, as long as ping is steady it's no problem, but this afternoon my ping was everything between 60 and 1200 and so charging was way wrong sometimes (overcharged @ mid of bar etc). otherwise ping really doesn't matter $\o/$

Goldeneye · Post by **Goldeneye** » 02-11-2003 01:40

Sina wrote: its good for 1on1

hm, would be nice if you could control multiple players then, eg everyone has 4 players so in a 1on1 this would be like a 4on4 and it wouldn't be that frustrating if you're killed first round as then you still had 3 other players left (you can control yourself) $\o/$

and yay for doublepost :p

InSaNe`DB · Post by **InSaNe`DB** » 02-11-2003 01:49

$\o/$ $\o/$ $\o/$

/o\ /o\ /o\

SPAM!

CeeBeeUK · Post by **CeeBeeUK** » 02-11-2003 08:22

Thanks for telling me what a beta is, now I know </sarcasm>

I posted late at night, in a bad mood, having spectated 25 minutes of a match I should have been played in. Sue me:ban:

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 02-11-2003 13:20

Sarcasm was always one of your qualities...!

CeeBeeUK · Post by **CeeBeeUK** » 02-11-2003 13:21

Sycophant wrote: Sarcasm was always one of your qualities...!

and I like to think it is one of my better ones

Onge · Post by **Onge** » 02-11-2003 13:26

Netter? Unlike your spelling!

CeeBeeUK · Post by **CeeBeeUK** » 02-11-2003 13:34

Damn you:rolleyes: Picky sod:D