Warfare new fair NumberInLine order idea
Moderators: Jay2k1, DavidM, The_One
Warfare new fair NumberInLine order idea
Consider 6 players playing on team red:
Player A
Player B
Player C
Player D
Player E
Player F
When the game starts each player gets a random NumberInLine.
Now it is that after each round that NumberInLine gets randomized again, but sometimes you will start last even if you died first (yes feediko, happened three times to you -_-)
But i thought of a more fair way to do it:
Let's imagine that player B, D and E died in reversed order.
Then the next round the order will be:
Player E
Player D
Player B
Player F
Player C
Player A
The player who dies first shoot firsts, and the the player who died second, and so on.
The players that still live will shoot after that, in reversed order of last round. Last round that was A,C,F, so now F,C,A.
Now the question: Good idea or not?
Player A
Player B
Player C
Player D
Player E
Player F
When the game starts each player gets a random NumberInLine.
Now it is that after each round that NumberInLine gets randomized again, but sometimes you will start last even if you died first (yes feediko, happened three times to you -_-)
But i thought of a more fair way to do it:
Let's imagine that player B, D and E died in reversed order.
Then the next round the order will be:
Player E
Player D
Player B
Player F
Player C
Player A
The player who dies first shoot firsts, and the the player who died second, and so on.
The players that still live will shoot after that, in reversed order of last round. Last round that was A,C,F, so now F,C,A.
Now the question: Good idea or not?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 02-07-2003 12:20
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 02-07-2003 12:20
- Contact:
1v1 - 1 player move from each side.
2v2 - 1 player move from each side
3v3 - 1 player move from each side
4v4 - 2 players move from each side
5v5 - 2 players move from each side
6v6 - 3 players move from each side
etc.
Otherwise... equal boring.
You could be last to shoot... wait 100 seconds.. and then be killed just before it gets to your shot.
next move is
/disconnect.
2v2 - 1 player move from each side
3v3 - 1 player move from each side
4v4 - 2 players move from each side
5v5 - 2 players move from each side
6v6 - 3 players move from each side
etc.
Otherwise... equal boring.
You could be last to shoot... wait 100 seconds.. and then be killed just before it gets to your shot.
next move is
/disconnect.
yeah i was thinking along the same lines, really pissed me off to die first and shoot last.
I was also thinking to speed stuff up it would be cool if you had the next shootround begin 3 seconds after the last shot was fired, rather than waiting for the damn superfountains to fall. Of course this would have to be an option.
I was also thinking to speed stuff up it would be cool if you had the next shootround begin 3 seconds after the last shot was fired, rather than waiting for the damn superfountains to fall. Of course this would have to be an option.
Stulovesyou wrote: If you die - bad luck.
Moral: Don't die.
If there are 6 players on a team...
You should have two players from each team moving at one time.
Seriously - 100 second wait for a shot... boring.
The point of reverse death order is so there is less time between shots for those who happen to die first which is usually down to bad luck, and not something which should be punished.