Posted: 08-11-2004 15:57
hmmmm, ngaaaaaaaa
<3
Page 10 of 17
Posted: 08-11-2004 16:56
omg plaer
<3
<3
Posted: 08-11-2004 17:09
lol 2093 <3, thats what im using 
2093x1538 or summink
2093x1538 or summinkPosted: 08-11-2004 18:52
me > joo
<3 lars Dillinger Escape Plan
<3 lars Dillinger Escape Plan
Posted: 08-11-2004 21:48
-plær- wrote: you knows it...
2048*768 resolution, win xp, winamp5 with mm3 skin, object dock, and schmexy evangelion wallpaper
Is that the mini-me skin?
I vote plær's for best looking one so far.
ps: DEP = rewl D:
<3 klaas
pps: seksi sig klaas D:
Posted: 08-11-2004 23:09
:d:d:D
shame he didnt make it in 2039,1538
shame he didnt make it in 2039,1538
Posted: 08-11-2004 23:52
sameXiLLeRaToR wrote: why is everybody suddenly going thru the phase of modding their desktops, i have win xp with everything set to best performance, ie it looks like win2k, i love my ram and i dont want it cluttered with pretty gui bullshit=)
Posted: 09-11-2004 01:56
Cenotaph wrote: same
And here.
Posted: 09-11-2004 03:42
i personally like a little style and very little on the desktop ie. the tabs
Posted: 09-11-2004 09:41
good thing aston takes less resources than normal windows then, or I would look like a dumbass with my desktop cluttered with pretty gui bullshit.
Posted: 09-11-2004 11:38
@ school...
Posted: 09-11-2004 14:14
problem i had with aston was that
a) it lacked some of the functionality of windows explorer
b) a lot of clever explorer plugins didnt work with aston properly (eg samurize)
c) unless you had another file management program, you ended up using explorer anyway when you browse directories - so your running explorer & aston!
a) it lacked some of the functionality of windows explorer
b) a lot of clever explorer plugins didnt work with aston properly (eg samurize)
c) unless you had another file management program, you ended up using explorer anyway when you browse directories - so your running explorer & aston!
Posted: 09-11-2004 19:56
fb.shev wrote: :d:d:D
shame he didnt make it in 2039,1538
You realise your screenshot is 1600x1200 right?
Posted: 09-11-2004 20:25
MESY LOL HE DOTHENT NO!"111!!!!11 DONT TEL HIM DOUHG
Posted: 09-11-2004 23:52
Messy wrote: You realise your screenshot is 1600x1200 right?
read the post again
shame he didnt make it in 2039,1538 meaning i wanted him to make it 2039x1538, hense me having a 1600x1200 when i wanted the higher resolution
-_-
edit:
im proper fuckin pissed off as i messed up 3 fucking pc's in one night trying to work my router.
i could make this post go down forever of the problems, main ones = fucked usb's, using ethernet, ethernet then doesnt work in my other pc, messed up LAC settings, fucked up settings on all pc's to acces internet, getting loads of LAC popups everywhere, pc now isnt gonna go in my room, im having regrets in buying the fucking thing, and im proper pissed of.
bye
fuck it
!
:@@@