System for the new DBL

Mayer.hun · Post by **Mayer.hun** » 03-02-2004 10:30

The NBA/NHL style sounds good to me... Make about 4-6 divisions (depends on how many teams would play) and every team has to play against each other, not only against those who r in your div... Wins-loss-Ties... who has the most wins, less loss, continues to the playoffs. I think the Second team should also advance or sth.

In the playoffs, there should be two matches... home team choses server... next match other team chooses. etc. If after two matches its 1-1, final match at a server chosen by league council or sth.

And the final shoould be only one match, with a server choosen by council...

Oh, n BTW, the Random map idea is good... It should be implented...

siLVer · Post by **siLVer** » 04-02-2004 19:20

hm, the nhl style seems to be better.
haven't red everything but has someone already thought about the nba style?

3 or 2 leagues with playoffs

Wibble · Post by **Wibble** » 04-02-2004 21:05

I personally think the key thing is to keep the length of the season down. One of the main reasons that people got pissed off with the last season was because it dragged on so much. Anything that keeps the length of the season short has to be a good thing.

Chubbs · Post by **Chubbs** » 05-02-2004 15:25

but the season will be long if teams don't have 5 players, or if they always want their best 5. This means that people need to be more active or the admins should start handing out more dw's if a team can't make it

siLVer · Post by **siLVer** » 05-02-2004 17:52

yes, if the team can't manage it to play it should get a dl.
if both can't play a dd

Morning*Star · Post by **Morning*Star** » 05-02-2004 18:17

default results are what fucked up the last season, and now you want more

Wibble · Post by **Wibble** » 05-02-2004 18:17

But how are you going to prove one way or the other? anyway, no team likes to take points from a dw

Morning*Star · Post by **Morning*Star** » 05-02-2004 18:18

Wibble wrote: no team likes to take points from a dw

you'd be suprised

Fooman · Post by **Fooman** » 05-02-2004 18:21

PLAYOFFS! gg season 2

nameless · Post by **nameless** » 10-02-2004 12:05

I disagree with the idea of small groups. In the last 3 seasons we had the problem of dropping clans. When the groups are even smaller, u got a group with 1 or 2 teams in it. That will be a lot of fun for those teams.

I m still supporting the utassault-style. Would be best for deathball in my opinion.

[1234]Jr · Post by **[1234]Jr** » 11-02-2004 11:13

Wibble wrote: But how are you going to prove one way or the other? anyway, no team likes to take points from a dw

i hope that was sarcasm

Every macth [123/4] played (or tried to

) and were late, there would be a certain someone from a certain country saying:

"10 mins before DW"

"5 mins"

"omfg, hurry up!"

True, we couldnt keep to a schedule

esp when on the way down

RaGe|DB · Post by **RaGe|DB** » 11-02-2004 16:20

[1234]Jr wrote: i hope that was sarcasm

Every macth [123/4] played (or tried to ) and were late, there would be a certain someone from a certain country saying:

"10 mins before DW"

"5 mins"

"omfg, hurry up!"

True, we couldnt keep to a schedule esp when on the way down

it wasn't me :p
i hate DW, dbl "should" be fun, not for winning

BlackFlame · Post by **BlackFlame** » 12-02-2004 00:12

ok i admit it, it was me