Page 2 of 3
Posted: 11-01-2004 23:23
by BlackFlame
point proven
Posted: 11-01-2004 23:26
by [3dg|rr]rekloV
100 points !

Posted: 12-01-2004 12:14
by SuBBy
Actually he is greater than me, as many comments he's posted will prove. This whole thing was intended as a joke and got a little bit out of hand. As he got banned yesterday from #dbpickup and i found it hilarious and people were talking in general in the channel saying things such as #lol and #owned, so i said #khushisbanned in #deathball and people flooded in. Then it got into a bit more of a hatred thing. I don't hate the guy, he just likes to annoy people, sometimes he can be ok. I'm sure we can all annoy people, just that khush is pro. Anyway i only see two people backing him up so far, as most people agree with the channel owner.
Posted: 12-01-2004 12:15
by SuBBy
By the way, I R NOT CHANNEL OWNER, i think it's star or someone

Posted: 12-01-2004 13:23
by Rens2Sea
That channel and all the ppl in there are gay
kthx
Posted: 12-01-2004 15:30
by Robotojon
really ? cant wait to get home so i can join then

Posted: 12-01-2004 15:42
by [GR]Kermit
Rens2Sea wrote:
That channel and all the ppl in there are gay
kthx
no DavidM is not with us

Posted: 12-01-2004 16:10
by |Taken|
true true...
Kushdi was banned for a reason and it's because he left when playing rule #5 i do believe.
No matter what he says if you pick up the phone and we don't pause you could still stay and play, i do it when needed.
I informed Elica and he/she (still not sure) took care of it.
:kthx:
Posted: 12-01-2004 16:27
by Messy
lol, Elica is definitely a she ;p
I heard him--err..her ;p talk real girlish to Robbie, I swear
<3 Eliano :p
Also,
[GR]Kermit wrote:
no DavidM is not with us
gg rens said "every1 in there is gay" (<--paraphrasing not quoting, hence the lack of lay-out through means of
)..not "every1 who is gay is in there" duh krem0t.
edit: just for taken, a (hopefully) easier to understand summary:
rens said: "everyone in that channel is a homosexual"
kermit replied: "no, not everyone in that channel can be homosexual because we don't have DavidM in there!"
cue me explaining: "Wrong kermit, that would only apply if rens said: 'All homosexuals are in that channel', which he didn't say, hence your mistake kermit."
Posted: 12-01-2004 16:30
by |Taken|
I'm english and i still don't understand...
Posted: 12-01-2004 17:09
by Morning*Star
SuBBy wrote:
By the way, I R NOT CHANNEL OWNER, i think it's star or someone
i merely requested L

Posted: 12-01-2004 17:11
by speedy
i get it!
Posted: 12-01-2004 17:25
by BlackFlame
im just saying i think its a little retarded and immature tomake a channel like that, like subby said it probably is a joke but still you gotta admit it is a little childish (i dont havea problem with most people in the channel)
Posted: 12-01-2004 17:30
by [GR]Kermit
Messy wrote:
gg rens said "every1 in there is gay" (<--paraphrasing not quoting, hence the lack of lay-out through means of
)..not "every1 who is gay is in there" duh krem0t.
edit: just for taken, a (hopefully) easier to understand summary:
rens said: "everyone in that channel is a homosexual"
kermit replied: "no, not everyone in that channel can be homosexual because we don't have DavidM in there!"
cue me explaining: "Wrong kermit, that would only apply if rens said: 'All homosexuals are in that channel', which he didn't say, hence your mistake kermit."
okay messy but we can't be 100% gay if DavidM isn't there.
So i correct Rens: "everyone is 99% gay in that channel"
so if you are too

to understand that

and

i learn english not for fun. i would be more satisfied if i would learn italian.
Pezzo di merda bastardo
I'm good eh?
Posted: 13-01-2004 21:20
by Xelent
kthx that channel pwns