Laptop or Desktop

Messy · Post by **Messy** » 06-10-2004 20:59

Well it just seems to me like you couldn't cool this enough to overclock the equipment currently in it :<

ps: So you've added the GF 6800 yourself?

and you're selling it for only € 1.000,00? o_O

..gg =\

And if it's sponsored by nvidia, why don't they at least add in one of their own components in the prize? ;p

Cenotaph · Post by **Cenotaph** » 06-10-2004 21:41

GreyFox wrote: who cares about the case tbh , but yea, like u said messy, kinda weird that they gave u a 350W ps

scores kinda little in 3d mark 05 imo , i get 3xxx with my 9800xt , or is it just much harder getting higher scores on 05 ?

Ati owns nVidia in 3dMark05... and that includes the latest GPU's...

Post by **The_One** » 06-10-2004 21:58

Yeah, NVidia scores low in 3DMark 2005. Still, I'd take a 6800 GT over a 9800XT any day of the week. It's much faster in games than 3Dmark shows.

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 06-10-2004 22:16

The_One wrote: Yeah, NVidia scores low in 3DMark 2005. Still, I'd take a 6800 GT over a 9800XT any day of the week. It's much faster in games than 3Dmark shows.

well anyone would. it's a 9800xt

i'd have an radeon x800 plzkthxnpshizzle<3!!!!!!!!u2LOLOawwplz!!!!!!111111

fro · Post by **fro** » 06-10-2004 22:19

Cenotaph wrote: Ati owns nVidia in 3dMark05... and that includes the latest GPU's...

3dmark is shit, best test is the performance when playing/using a well specced machine. my gt flies through anything you can throw at it.

Post by **The_One** » 06-10-2004 22:32

speedy wrote: well anyone would. it's a 9800xt

i'd have an radeon x800 plzkthxnpshizzle<3!!!!!!!!u2LOLOawwplz!!!!!!111111

That's my point. 3DMark doesn't really show that.

I get 5776 3Dwanks with my x800xt pe for what it's worth. I wouldn't say it completely blows 6800s out of the water in games though (well, maybe in some :p )

fb.shev · Post by **fb.shev** » 06-10-2004 23:02

stu m8, bin the 9200 (prolly will be an SE version) and get a 9600 for £40/50 O_O_O_O_O

speedy u get that x800 n ill get a 6800 ultra LOLS!

ill be getting a 300W psu.. let alone a 350

and ill be getting a 9800XT for £70 when my motherboard (intel 1), cpu (3.0 prescott) and ram come (512 PC3200 400)... not brill, but good for £300

might chuck in a crt 17" for £61

lol just though speedy, this gfx will own urs !! LOL.

shall i get the artic gfx cooler (£20) for the 9800XT? i saw it there... and i dont wanna burn it

but does anyone else have it/problems/worth it? i dunno

Austin^13 · Post by **Austin^13** » 07-10-2004 16:02

Austin^13 wrote: noob i already told you, acctually getting 120GB 2.8 512 ddr 9200 ATi radeon WINNAR :D:

now got 160gb 9700 ATi radeon

f1end · Post by **f1end** » 07-10-2004 16:25

Depends on the game too...

Nvidia pwns on UT2004

ATI pwns on HL2

Who cares anyway...

*strokes his GF4

does me fine...I've been playing computer games since ZX spectrum days...and had loads of fun even though the graphix sucked... I can't keep up with all these new cards anyway.

fb.shev · Post by **fb.shev** » 08-10-2004 16:22

Austin^13 wrote: now got 160gb 9700 ATi radeon

still bin it

get nVIDIA, supports more

.. and u would only play ut i would think ^^

Post by **The_One** » 08-10-2004 16:30

Supports more? More what? Games? hehehe

fb.shev · Post by **fb.shev** » 08-10-2004 20:53

ut as i said m8

Post by **The_One** » 08-10-2004 21:01

Well ATI is faster in UT (at the highest settings) if that's what you mean. Of course I'm making a large leap here as you don't seem to be able to express yourself very clearly.

l0afz · Post by **l0afz** » 08-10-2004 21:36

my radeon 9700 pro sucks

fb.shev · Post by **fb.shev** » 09-10-2004 11:19

would a 9800XT suck?

im considering getting it with an artic cooler

Notpron Forums

Laptop or Desktop

Whats better?