Page 3 of 4
Posted: 06-10-2004 20:59
by Messy
Well it just seems to me like you couldn't cool this enough to overclock the equipment currently in it :<
ps: So you've added the GF 6800 yourself?

and you're selling it for only € 1.000,00? o_O
..gg =\
And if it's sponsored by nvidia, why don't they at least add in one of their own components in the prize? ;p
Posted: 06-10-2004 21:41
by Cenotaph
GreyFox wrote:
who cares about the case tbh , but yea, like u said messy, kinda weird that they gave u a 350W ps
scores kinda little in 3d mark 05 imo , i get 3xxx with my 9800xt , or is it just much harder getting higher scores on 05 ?
Ati owns nVidia in 3dMark05... and that includes the latest GPU's...
Posted: 06-10-2004 21:58
by The_One
Yeah, NVidia scores low in 3DMark 2005. Still, I'd take a 6800 GT over a 9800XT any day of the week. It's much faster in games than 3Dmark shows.
Posted: 06-10-2004 22:16
by speedy
The_One wrote:
Yeah, NVidia scores low in 3DMark 2005. Still, I'd take a 6800 GT over a 9800XT any day of the week. It's much faster in games than 3Dmark shows.
well anyone would. it's a 9800xt
i'd have an radeon x800 plzkthxnpshizzle<3!!!!!!!!u2LOLOawwplz!!!!!!111111
Posted: 06-10-2004 22:19
by fro
Cenotaph wrote:
Ati owns nVidia in 3dMark05... and that includes the latest GPU's...
3dmark is shit, best test is the performance when playing/using a well specced machine. my gt flies through anything you can throw at it.
Posted: 06-10-2004 22:32
by The_One
speedy wrote:
well anyone would. it's a 9800xt
i'd have an radeon x800 plzkthxnpshizzle<3!!!!!!!!u2LOLOawwplz!!!!!!111111
That's my point. 3DMark doesn't really show that.
I get 5776 3Dwanks with my x800xt pe for what it's worth. I wouldn't say it completely blows 6800s out of the water in games though (well, maybe in some :p )
Posted: 06-10-2004 23:02
by fb.shev
stu m8, bin the 9200 (prolly will be an SE version) and get a 9600 for £40/50 O_O_O_O_O
speedy u get that x800 n ill get a 6800 ultra LOLS!
ill be getting a 300W psu.. let alone a 350
and ill be getting a 9800XT for £70 when my motherboard (intel 1), cpu (3.0 prescott) and ram come (512 PC3200 400)... not brill, but good for £300
might chuck in a crt 17" for £61
lol just though speedy, this gfx will own urs !! LOL.
shall i get the artic gfx cooler (£20) for the 9800XT? i saw it there... and i dont wanna burn it

but does anyone else have it/problems/worth it? i dunno

Posted: 07-10-2004 16:02
by Austin^13
Austin^13 wrote:
noob i already told you, acctually getting 120GB 2.8 512 ddr 9200 ATi radeon WINNAR

:D:
now got 160gb 9700 ATi radeon

Posted: 07-10-2004 16:25
by f1end
Depends on the game too...
Nvidia pwns on UT2004
ATI pwns on HL2
Who cares anyway...
*strokes his GF4
does me fine...I've been playing computer games since ZX spectrum days...and had loads of fun even though the graphix sucked... I can't keep up with all these new cards anyway.
Posted: 08-10-2004 16:22
by fb.shev
Austin^13 wrote:
now got 160gb 9700 ATi radeon
still bin it
get nVIDIA, supports more

.. and u would only play ut i would think ^^
Posted: 08-10-2004 16:30
by The_One
Supports more? More what? Games? hehehe
Posted: 08-10-2004 20:53
by fb.shev
ut as i said m8
Posted: 08-10-2004 21:01
by The_One
Well ATI is faster in UT (at the highest settings) if that's what you mean. Of course I'm making a large leap here as you don't seem to be able to express yourself very clearly.

Posted: 08-10-2004 21:36
by l0afz
my radeon 9700 pro sucks
Posted: 09-10-2004 11:19
by fb.shev
would a 9800XT suck?
im considering getting it with an artic cooler