Page 3 of 3
Posted: 03-05-2006 17:07
by fro
bear in mind that they already have your address whether you are 'protected' by bluefrog or not.
enjoy
i dont agree with their policy of fighting spam with spam, its retarded at best
Posted: 17-05-2006 18:34
by fro
thus the story is over;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01873.html
blue sec give up, its always a bad day when the bad guy wins, but lol regardless.
Posted: 17-05-2006 19:48
by kewangji
stop double posting fro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: 17-05-2006 21:56
by fro
eat my shorts
Posted: 17-05-2006 22:01
by Rincewind SW
I think Fro wins here.
"bear in mind that they already have your address whether you are 'protected' by bluefrog or not.
enjoy"
Now what, for us lot? D:
Posted: 17-05-2006 22:07
by fro
hope that your shitty client side email protection/filtering does its job. client side being this, something like it or thunderbirds bayiesien(? its late and im tired, sod spelling) filters start picking up the new patterns.
or, your isp/email provider starts tuning their middle tier filtering (spamassasin et al). i guess webmails such as hotmail or gmail are running similar or like technology so no need to worry too much
Posted: 17-05-2006 22:40
by Messy
The only thing that ever gets in my inbox are those threatening spammers' mails, so I'll be fine probably.
..oh well
it was worth a try?