Posted: 30-05-2006 18:19
don't forget the pens
Notpron Forums
Show me your ugly rigs
Page 3 of 4
Posted: 30-05-2006 19:50
wtf hairbrush...
Posted: 30-05-2006 20:54
acer laptop ... designed for microsoft windows xp ... ehhh .... aspire 3000 series.
Posted: 30-05-2006 22:03
And mouse, wires, white desk and stuff.
Yeah, you use them to brush your hair with... it was just on the desk.
EDIT: And blue cup.
Yeah, you use them to brush your hair with... it was just on the desk.
EDIT: And blue cup.
Posted: 30-05-2006 22:42
yes! very important blue cup!
Posted: 30-05-2006 23:06
Messy wrote: HOLY PETER PAN BATMAN!
ps: What kind of sennies are those?
heh HD 465's. The store was out of HD 208's -.- so my parents got me them.
Posted: 30-05-2006 23:26
wtf moniter sticker.
shit, my 17" can give a higher reso than a 19" monitor?
shit, my 17" can give a higher reso than a 19" monitor?
Posted: 31-05-2006 01:34
meh. i dont use it at that, computer cant handle it 
Posted: 31-05-2006 04:07
No, it can't. Your monitor only displays 1280x1024 at most, whatever you have it set to.fb.shev wrote: shit, my 17" can give a higher reso than a 19" monitor?
Posted: 31-05-2006 11:14
thats funny, cuz i can see alot more 1600x1200 than 1280x1024.....oh yeah wait cuz its displaying 1600x1200....
Posted: 31-05-2006 11:45
...Clueless
Monitors have a native resolution as well as a maximum resolution shev.
..whatever your OS can push it to: 1280x1024 is the native resolution for your monitor (according to The_One, a wise enough man for me to trust :p) and anything above it will cause it to run at less than optimal conditions (bye eyes, bye sharpness and detail) despite the fact that saying you have a 'big' resolution increases your e-penis size.
However, I might add that running above native resolution isn't all that big a problem all the time I'm kind of pushing it as well, but I'll happily give up a bit of sharpness for a better overview on what I'm doing on the desktop. As soon as I'm playing a game or whatever though: it's back to a lower reso (also for the fact my computer can't run UT2004 very well over 1024*768)
Monitors have a native resolution as well as a maximum resolution shev.
..whatever your OS can push it to: 1280x1024 is the native resolution for your monitor (according to The_One, a wise enough man for me to trust :p) and anything above it will cause it to run at less than optimal conditions (bye eyes, bye sharpness and detail) despite the fact that saying you have a 'big' resolution increases your e-penis size.
However, I might add that running above native resolution isn't all that big a problem all the time
I'm kind of pushing it as well, but I'll happily give up a bit of sharpness for a better overview on what I'm doing on the desktop. As soon as I'm playing a game or whatever though: it's back to a lower reso (also for the fact my computer can't run UT2004 very well over 1024*768)Posted: 31-05-2006 12:50
oh my e-penis grows if you have a bigger resolution?
cool.
*plugs it into 2048x1536* (sec)
And yes messy.. i do know... good thing is, 1600x1200 is still nice and sharp, and even if i dont notice, my eyes are fine with it O_o.
1920x1200 is just a tad squashed version of 1600x1200... but its fucking useful trust as its the only widescreen option my montior gives..
p.s. why arent people using 1280x960 :s its 4:3 :A
cool.
*plugs it into 2048x1536* (sec)
And yes messy.. i do know... good thing is, 1600x1200 is still nice and sharp, and even if i dont notice, my eyes are fine with it O_o.
1920x1200 is just a tad squashed version of 1600x1200... but its fucking useful trust as its the only widescreen option my montior gives..
p.s. why arent people using 1280x960 :s its 4:3 :A
Posted: 31-05-2006 13:20
fb.shev wrote: thats funny, cuz i can see alot more 1600x1200 than 1280x1024.....oh yeah wait cuz its displaying 1600x1200....
1280x1024 is a bullshit resolutiong, its not even 4:3
I use 1600x1200x100hz on the right
and 1024x768 on the left
Posted: 31-05-2006 17:06
It's a VESA standard though. Been around longer than 1280x960. Plus it would be a bit stupid running a 4:3 resolution on a 5:4 LCD. LCDs are 5:4 because of substrate size.
Posted: 31-05-2006 18:11
pictures get messed up, i cant render with 1280x1024...
anyway.
1600x1200 and 1024x768 are just the best reso, they are the two i use the most, but with 1920x1200 when i wanna read more stuff
anyway.
1600x1200 and 1024x768 are just the best reso, they are the two i use the most, but with 1920x1200 when i wanna read more stuff