Page 208 of 213

Posted: 10-10-2006 17:03
by geiogunn
Because I use my yellow toothbrush to eat pie on wensdays?

Posted: 10-10-2006 17:05
by Kisa
Wednesdays ;)

Posted: 11-10-2006 13:54
by cl3tUs
because the weight is evenly proportioned and the corners won't cut your face off.

Posted: 12-10-2006 17:14
by spike68
Once apon a time...
There was these midgets. Now, these midgets knew nothing of geometry. So they always made theyre manhole covers oblique shapes. So they ended up as pointy ovals, or a freaky form of picaso art. But since they didn't know how to keep it the same, each manhole was different, thus having a different way to open each one. Then one day, a small meteor was falling twards the planet. Eventually it landed and made a perfect circle in the ground (Don't ask me how). Then when they all gathered to look, the meteor had become flattened into a perfect circle inside the hole. Afterwards, they dug it out and placed it upon the hole. Then the sun shone like never before, and the animals and peoples rejoyced with the finding of: THE CIRCLE!

The end?

Posted: 16-10-2006 02:31
by mephistol
Nicky wrote: They are obviously round because someone in the factory lost their ruler and could only find a compass :D

What about another question :D

Apart from the obvious! What can you use a paperclip for?


I actually made "Jew's Harp" from one once.

As far as life gows it's obviously to make noise (*refer to the paper clip statement)
by making noise, we creat soundwaves which cause the earth to tremble which in turn sloshes the molten lava inside, causing a reverse gyroscopic action, which makes the planet rotate in place. This allows the lifeforms to get an equal amount of light and dark, promoting growth and development. This growth and development is what is commonly referred to as "life". Therefore life is it's own meaning and cheese is the most universal and varied food in the galaxy.

Posted: 19-10-2006 21:40
by a devout uncyclopedian
Hmmm... why are manhole covers round...

To answer this, I went to the The Great Library of Infinite, Useless, Boring and Annoying Information which btw. has COMPLETE LACK OF HUMOUR (Wikipedia for short), and I found the answer:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhole_cover

By reading this article, I not only found where this discussion came from, I also have evidence that suggests all Wikipedia authors do not have a life, as they would rather write an article over manholes than doing ANYTHING ELSE available on the Internet or in real life!!

Paperclips are an entirely different story! with undoubted faith I will show you the Funny Truth!

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Paperclip

(My sincere appologies for making way too much links in all my posts and annoying everyone further with my uncyclopedia madness)

Posted: 20-10-2006 03:31
by flashstorm
There is no meaning of life simply because their is no life. What we all are experiencing now is simply some mean overlored putting thoughts into our "mind" and making us think that they're our own. This is why notpron is so incestively difficult, for the Overlord forced DavidM to think in ways more creative than those who must worship him could ever possibly conceive. Also, that very evil overloard plays favorites. Why? Because my sweet, sweet little brother was given almighty knowledge for Overlanhakmas, and all I got was this lousy [strike]omnipotence[/strike] kitten. Yes, kitten. I love my beautiful, wonderful [strike]omnipotence[/strike]... I mean kitten. He [strike]destroys the world[/strike] purs. I wuffles him!

Oh, and watch the BBCode not work.

EDIT: Yup, I knew it. Oh well, you can figure it out.

Posted: 20-10-2006 07:53
by a devout uncyclopedian
Whoa! You're going a bit fast saying there is no life at all!

To find the Meaning of Life, you have to define life itself. Then, when you have found an answer, you have to figure out what the exact opposite is. Only then will you know what reasons you have to live for, and thus what life means to you.

for example, life or living for me is laughter, joy, experience and scientific learning. What is the opposite of these things? Scientology (seriously, who believes that an evil lord comes to Earth in alien spacecrafts which look like DC8 bombers, and then starts sacrificing other aliens in a volcano, whose spirits then roam Earth and cause depression?? Tom Cruise, do us all a favor and come out of the closet).

So, what is the Meaning of Life? using every opportunity to express your sincere concerns over Scientology, Wikipedia and other sources of seriously dangerous facts.

http://www.theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com/

Posted: 01-11-2006 15:03
by Nicky
New question?

Posted: 01-11-2006 21:21
by Kisa
Why are spiderwebs still sticky even if they are years old?

Posted: 10-11-2006 21:55
by Apphex
Manhole covers are not round. They are polygons with an infinite number of sides. The Bush administration has told me that if I look close enough, I can see the sides. At first I didn't believe them, but they just kept on saying it over and over so I guess it must be true.

Posted: 10-11-2006 22:18
by Apphex
TheCanadianGuy wrote: The meaning of life is that : F(g) = Gmm^1/d^2 where f equals
the frequency of a floppy disk drive and a 56.6k modem connecting all together and sending subliminal messages to your
toaster making him burn your toast to an horrible crisp ...
And thats How the flashlight you should be holding (if not eat napoletan icecream or whatever and let me finish) was born!!
meaning that you are all x+10 times the age of a 10 yo + 20 minus the sum of your father and mother age divided by 4 times 0
+ your age ! see it works it all fits thats why the meaning of life MUST be F(g) = Gmm^1/d^2

(ps:F(g) = Gmm^1/d^2 calculate the gravitional force between two objects in the universe)


You must be a first-year physics undergrad, or maybe taking the first year because it is required for whatever bio or chem thingy you happen to be majoring in. Or maybe that rediculous formula you quoted comes from the load of crap they teach high school physics students.

Anyway, the m^1 that you wrote is wrong, and even if it were correct, it would be meaningless (anything raised to the first power is itself, rendering the ^1 a redundant and superfluous waste of space) The formula is F(g) = [Gm1m2/(r^2)]<r>

Notice the use of r instead of d. You will learn more about this when you get into advanced multivariable vector calculus that deals with spherical coordinates. The r arises because forces are DIRECTIONAL, not only magnitudinal. The inverse of the magnitude of the distance is something you intended to include, but you forgot the direction, which can only be accounted for if you multiply the whole thing by the unit vector <r>. So if you are going to do this correctly, why have a d^2 followed by a <r>? You wouldn't, of course, because d and r are really the same thing, but <r> certainly is not.

Posted: 10-11-2006 23:14
by a devout uncyclopedian
spiderwebs are sticky cuz there are little gnomes all around the world who, at daybreak, scuffle through the grass and brush dew on it, brush glue on the spiderwebs, and I also suspect them of moving our garden gnomes all over the place. They also steal my mini tea set and have a cup of tea under the floorboards of our kitchen. Somehow no one else seems to notice them...

Posted: 11-11-2006 02:30
by meep98324
Apphex wrote: You must be a first-year physics undergrad, or maybe taking the first year because it is required for whatever bio or chem thingy you happen to be majoring in. Or maybe that rediculous formula you quoted comes from the load of crap they teach high school physics students.

Anyway, the m^1 that you wrote is wrong, and even if it were correct, it would be meaningless (anything raised to the first power is itself, rendering the ^1 a redundant and superfluous waste of space) The formula is F(g) = [Gm1m2/(r^2)]<r>

Notice the use of r instead of d. You will learn more about this when you get into advanced multivariable vector calculus that deals with spherical coordinates. The r arises because forces are DIRECTIONAL, not only magnitudinal. The inverse of the magnitude of the distance is something you intended to include, but you forgot the direction, which can only be accounted for if you multiply the whole thing by the unit vector <r>. So if you are going to do this correctly, why have a d^2 followed by a <r>? You wouldn't, of course, because d and r are really the same thing, but <r> certainly is not.


Plus, this formula is kind of pointless because technically every object exerts gravitational force on each other, so you would need to calculate the forces with respect to every other gravitational force in the universe if you wanted to be totally accurate.

Posted: 13-11-2006 12:14
by Nicky
Spiderwebs are sticky because they are made from trees :)