Notpron Forums

hm, what about this sound ?

(just copied & pasted last 200 milisecs of the current wav file and pitched it up by 3 semitones )

hm goldy, it doesnt connect to the new added part properly

indiphil
feel free to mail me any sounds you got
should be about 1.45s (has to be reedited when we are done with the balancing)

goldy /o\


reminds me a bit @ overloading sound , so it would confuse me

ok i've worked a few noises out here at work but need to fine tune them at home with a better sound program. i'll post em in a few hours.

hint, mix 2 sounds, a low one and a high one, makes a cool effect
then let em go up 1-2 octaves

ok here are 3 sounds i made, i'll make more later when i got more time. i gotta go bust up the microphone with mybaddessretard self for me band practice wooo

http://www.anatomyofillusion.com/deathb ... arge01.wav

http://www.anatomyofillusion.com/deathb ... arge02.wav

http://www.anatomyofillusion.com/deathb ... arge03.wav

i like that
02 and 03
but it starts a big like a drum, can the start be changed?

yeah, i put that in just cuz I figured the gun might have a start sound. but it can just be a smooth start without it.

nah there must be something at the start...but that drum kinda thing isnt doing it for me

instead of replacing the sound completely... id just add an extra 0.2 seconds to it... like an overload (not not overcharge) sound..

i think it would be teh pwn.

maybe evebn a gated effect..

poooaaaaAAAAAAAAA AA AA A A A A UNGHHHH

good idea :p

priior wrote: instead of replacing the sound completely... id just add an extra 0.2 seconds to it... like an overload (not not overcharge) sound..

i think it would be teh pwn.

maybe evebn a gated effect..

poooaaaaAAAAAAAAA AA AA A A A A UNGHHHH

that's more or less what i did /o/

poooaaaaAAAAAAAAA AA AA A A A A UNGHHHH

that's you in the bathroom o_O

I just hate those keeps who call me a dickhead after I shoot a normal shot in 1on1

I hate VO so count me out, i prefer a normal 1on1

ONTOPPIC:
Sounds good. But i think this will end up with even more cross-volleys. Defense needs to go away from the pbox, great idea, i like that point, but there s even more space for a crossvolley. Cos of that i d say - like someone else before - reduce the volleypower and/or the radius a bit.

I m just afraid of the new power / chargeup a bit. breakaways will be much easier and keepers won t have a descent change to stop him... but that s the way it goes.

Get better at stopping shots then . At the moment there's very little room for attackers' skill when shooting, keepers can save every single shot - whether they do or not is down to the keeper, but it's frustrating that, as an attacker, there is very little I can do to score if the keeper is just gonna save every single shot I take, no matter how accurate it might be. I'd prefer for there to be a bit more skill involved with scoring rather than just luck (although I know keepers would be frustrated at not being able to save absolutely everything. There's a balance somewhere here). What if we had two types of volley though? A simple one that was a bit less powerful than the current one (so you could still make snap volleys) and a more powerful one that you had to charge up a little more, so the timing had to be better.... perhaps?