Awww.
Posted: 10-05-2004 21:28
But maybe that's because I don't like racing games
..and I've probably played a way too early beta last time I saw it 
Page 1 of 2
Posted: 10-05-2004 22:10
UnWheel sucks monkey balls imo ;x
But maybe that's because I don't like racing games ..and I've probably played a way too early beta last time I saw it
But maybe that's because I don't like racing games
..and I've probably played a way too early beta last time I saw it Posted: 10-05-2004 23:15
I like racing games. UnWheel does suck.
Posted: 10-05-2004 23:39
"shit happens" 
Posted: 11-05-2004 00:02
"and then you die"
Posted: 11-05-2004 00:17
Life's a beach, go lie on it
Posted: 11-05-2004 02:26
I'm sure, if DB got their new models out, they probably woulda won. A big graphical overhaul might have the yield a two time victory, alas, we must wait for the next phase.
Posted: 11-05-2004 02:53
unreal demolition > unwheel 
Posted: 11-05-2004 06:35
differences between 1.8 (phase1) and 1.9 (phase2) were not that big, mainly replay.
they also judge on changes. so if you submit the same again you have no chance.
they also judge on changes. so if you submit the same again you have no chance.
Posted: 11-05-2004 08:23
Great, nice to know fixing THEIR bugs means zip 
oh, btw, you know people said "we dont want this like fifa!"?
NOOOOOOO
oh, btw, you know people said "we dont want this like fifa!"?
Them
The First Person View makes it be Fifa's next generation in terms of gamplay.
NOOOOOOO
Posted: 11-05-2004 10:42
Scotteh wrote: unreal demolition > unwheel
Posted: 11-05-2004 11:01
I will say that while I'm not floored by Unwheel, the ctf and "rabbit" games are exactly what I was looking for in some of the suggestions I was making to the UD team.. Almost makes me wonder if they were spying. Either that, or they had compared it to the older games I had in mind and wanted the same thing in UT.
Either way, get back to developing. As much as UD is your baby, and you love it as such, there's no denying that unwheel is much further down the road.. no pun intended.
As for it beating Deathball.. gamewise, no way. But when davidm pointed out the criteria... oh.. well... Yeah. DB didn't get enough into the product in time vs the changes uw did.
Either way, get back to developing. As much as UD is your baby, and you love it as such, there's no denying that unwheel is much further down the road.. no pun intended.
As for it beating Deathball.. gamewise, no way. But when davidm pointed out the criteria... oh.. well... Yeah. DB didn't get enough into the product in time vs the changes uw did.
Posted: 11-05-2004 11:14
makes not much sense
on one hand they say you dont need to qualify for another phase, each round is independet, but on th other hand they judge on changes made from phase 1 to phase 2
hm! 0_o
on one hand they say you dont need to qualify for another phase, each round is independet, but on th other hand they judge on changes made from phase 1 to phase 2
hm! 0_o
Posted: 11-05-2004 11:45
Maybe they made more changes because UnWheel was less 'perfected' than DB, a flawed product that won out of sympathy in Phase 1 and because of this they had to make more changes
grrr
Maybe not, though..
grrr
Maybe not, though..
Posted: 11-05-2004 12:40
Catalyst88 wrote: Life's a beach, go lie on it
Life's a bitch, and then you marry one =\