2.1 moaning

Shev.npu · Post by **Shev.npu** » 23-08-2004 11:31

yay for me

anyway, bugs for 2.1? yup... me n goldy were playing wastelands... he scores (gg) and he spawns next to the ball

!!! (fuking hax0r) and err he scores again gg lam0r! :\

any fix for this? (no not him scoring, he sucks reallie)

also, spawn point for smallcube = in area, cant boost them out when they are somehow spawned as goalie.. /o\

Achilles · Post by **Achilles** » 23-08-2004 11:51

u nub just post in the stickythread

Shev.npu · Post by **Shev.npu** » 23-08-2004 11:52

Achilles wrote: u nub just post in the stickythread

thats a beta thread

i wanted to make me own..

Maegrim · Post by **Maegrim** » 23-08-2004 14:32

yeah, he thinks he's special

Shady · Post by **Shady** » 23-08-2004 14:51

some of us are downloading maps off DBL1 and other 2.1 servers also x_X

R3L!K · Post by **R3L!K** » 23-08-2004 17:11

/me wonders when the euro servers will be updated... cba with the whiney US kiddies on the BuD server..

Shev.npu · Post by **Shev.npu** » 23-08-2004 18:09

yes im special

~ ="=

and still cant figure out why u cant play on the servers

jus delete everything about deathball and install the zip

also im not sure if its db or not but when i play botmatch or instant action watever, my mouse wont move and it lags really bad, still having same fps and stuff, its reallly unplayable

R3L!K · Post by **R3L!K** » 23-08-2004 18:27

turned off reduce mouse lag and all voice comms ?

l0afz · Post by **l0afz** » 23-08-2004 18:55

seems some people are moaning about worse fps

mine seems same on cube, havnt had any problems really - only wastlands gives me like 15 fps - but fro owns so it doesn't matter

Sina · Post by **Sina** » 23-08-2004 19:13

i get better fps on 2.1

Shev.npu · Post by **Shev.npu** » 23-08-2004 19:19

better fps here yeah, ive had better fps since using the cmd and not ut .. gg me

yep @ relik, i have no idea

Shady · Post by **Shady** » 23-08-2004 19:53

no fps problems here.

Twigstir · Post by **Twigstir** » 23-08-2004 20:22

All indications lead to 2.1 being worse performance wise.

Post by **The_One** » 23-08-2004 21:09

Obviously not all indications, no.

Twigstir · Post by **Twigstir** » 23-08-2004 21:21

Let me state it another way: 2.1 is worse performance wise.