Notpron Forums

fa cup final...what_a_match!!!

reina, fucked up, like dudek normally does... saves the day, like dudek normally does... liverpool totally controlled by west ham but experience proved the better on our side.

comeon scousers, bring that fa cup backkck home where it belongsss

geRRard (double r! ok?! because that's really important) is a crazy madafucker ..

so is gerrard \o

lucky harewood was injured because he could have won it for west ham :s

speedy wrote: lucky harewood was injured because he could have won it for west ham :s

lucky harewood was right footed you mean cuz he still wouldnt of scored.

lucky liverpool had reina, lucky gerrard scored 2 beauties, lucky cisse scored another beauty.

oh wait sorry all thats not luck its skill.

ahem.

lucky carragher scored an own goal
lucky konchesky cant aim a cross properly
lucky when it hit ashtons leg it span over to the far post only to cross the line.

previously posted by sarcasm

oh wait yeah, thats even more skillful.

You forgot to make the text bold.

Originally posted by Messy
You forgot to make the text bold.

I'm one of those who dont actually like to see quotations bold. I unbold them on most forums. but mh. why. its like... doesnt make it stand out more.

if harewood wasnt injured he could of scored and won it for west ham

fro wrote: if harewood wasnt injured he could of scored and won it for west ham

cisse had more of a chance with an attempted one on one thru ball that marlons, high left foot swing i.m.o... the goal line was blocked virtually anyway...professional footballer he should of brought it down with his left then swung a boot at it... trust, injury there for westhams glory...bullshit!

i think that if harewood could walk he would of scored and west ham would of won

fro wrote: i think that if harewood could walk he would of scored and west ham would of won

I think that if half the liverpool players (not going ott) didnt get cramp, liverpool would of won or seen it to 3-3 piece of cake.

and....rofl. harewood if he could walk




we'll agree to disagree then.

fb.shev wrote: I'm one of those who dont actually like to see quotations bold.

Then why did you leave the other quote in bold? :<

Messy wrote: Then why did you leave the other quote in bold? :<

because i cba with this forum. the majority of other forums i use bold often. so when quoting, it ruins it if all bold. i dunno why people have bold, you have to read it anyway...its not trying to advertise itself being bolder.. O_o

Some people use bold for SARCASM but im naming no names.

Oh, gave that one away didn't I?

`Ghost` wrote: Some people use bold for SARCASM but im naming no names.

Oh, gave that one away didn't I?

now if i quoted you, you wouldnt see the sarcasm would you