Where are they?
Please fix.
IMO - the stats on the scoreboards should complement the prior system scores. Not replace.
More stats = better than less.
note: I am a prior ngstats addict
eg I wrote this review - purely off ngstats... I like stats.. likey... alot..
http://pub29.ezboard.com/fcloutfrm6.sho ... ID=7.topic
(til epic killed them by selling to microsoft... by I digress)
The 1.6 scores were not perfect in any way. An example is here:
http://www.clandx.com/demo/frkstok_curve.jpg
Note: Armageddon was the freaks keeper... he got scored on 9 times but still was top scorer.
What does this tell you?
To the untrained eye... stat = ghey...
HOWEVERArmageddon
Hehe, if anyone needed proof that the current scoring system is total crap, my score is proof positive (particularly in curve)
Which was true. I didn't see the match - but its easy enough to tell that freaks weren't passing well. They were turning over the ball and giving up points to the TOK players.me
No that's indicative that you were goalkeeper - and had to save a lot of shots.
Team score is also very indicative of match result. It means lots of turnovers = low scores.
Possession is close'ish - but a good stat would be 'territory'. Most likely it spent the majority of the time with TOK attacking - hence keeper gets a lot of balls.
Note here - individual score does not mean much other than player v player (keeper v keeper for example) to show who was more active during the map.
(demolution tok keeper - not much to do = bored)
It is the team scores that mean everything. Freaks players were all down in the teens... tok up 40s / 50s above. It shows that as a team TOK outplayed Freaks player for player... hence the 9-0 result.
1.7 stats COMPLEMENT the 1.6 stats wonderfully. You could take for example Chillens -12 and disect it. Passes missed, turnovers etc.
Just showing up as small red stats on the scoreboard does not make this stand out as much as the big phat -12.
The 1.6 scores will give you an indicative knowledge of your relative position in the map. How active you were etc.
The 1.7 stats will show disect your individual game. You cannot really compare your performance to others so well.
Two attackers in 1.6 - you could see who was more active - who did more. 1.7 shows 'what' they did more.
The who 1.6 score is the 'at a glance stat' that has existed since the beginning of time in every FPS. Let's not be rid of it.
The 1.7 stats provide the depth that makes stat monkeys like myself rack up a mega screenshot collection :p
Ultimately though.... sure they all may be useless... but think of the junkys... the junky!!!
