Page 2 of 3

Posted: 07-11-2003 18:22
by BurntLeaf
If the defense is slack and we have a man up their half, why should I waste my time charging pass to him?

Posted: 07-11-2003 19:11
by R3L!K
heh interesting to see the responses. yeah, i guess it would be unworkable since primary fire passing would take too long.

but what i don't like about the current system is that its too easy to clear a ball to a guy hanging on the other side of the pitch.

Of course there should be a guy defending against a goal hanger, I know, but the point is that more often than not, the attacking team lose the initiative by something that is effectively a skill-less move.

imo, the defending team need to earn the right to pass a ball all the way upfield by taking a little more time to pull it off.

i realise it's probably an unpopular idea...

Posted: 07-11-2003 19:14
by The_One
Maybe it could be made so the crosshair had to be right over them for a succesful long distance pass to be made.

Posted: 07-11-2003 19:18
by R3L!K
yeah that would be fairer i think.

Armagon: I suggest loads of really stupid ideas all the time and some good ones too.. I'd only be upset if I stopped having ideas altogether :D

Posted: 08-11-2003 14:00
by Messy
YoYo789 wrote: "Viva Le Revolution!"


La Revolution* .....i think :eek:

Anyway, how bout making passes possible always, but make them not so surgically precise after a semi-long range has eben exceeded.

So when u've gotten rid of the banana passes...u can reimplement them for that ;)

gg davidm's new nightmare :eek:

Posted: 08-11-2003 19:10
by R3L!K
i think alt-fire passes should remain 'surgically precise' but as The_One says, should require a bit more aim to pass to people further away.

Posted: 08-11-2003 19:35
by bURNINGrOID
What if the further the pass was, the less accurate it was? 20 yard passes would be perfect, but hucking it down the field would be less precise.

Posted: 08-11-2003 19:53
by Messy
That's what I said burning :p

Posted: 08-11-2003 20:04
by R3L!K
it would really suck if as an attacker u managed to get a little space on a defender as you run towards the goal, then you call for a pass only to see it go straight to the defender because of a 'random inaccuracy factor over a long range'.

sorry, but right-click passes NEED to be precise.

To restate my point from the beginning. What sucks with the current system is that I can lock onto someone miles away without even needing to look at them and clear the ball immediately.

At least have it so far away targets have to be aimed at to lock on to them.

Posted: 08-11-2003 20:27
by Ars3h
Lincoln City 3-1 Brighton and Hove Albion

spam

Posted: 08-11-2003 21:08
by Sixty
i really do see a day when euro's ask for alt pass to be taken out...
Not everything has to do with EU-NA u kniw. This is just a thread of a DB playa making a suggestion, what does it have to do with EU-NA :eek:

Posted: 08-11-2003 21:35
by Dazlin
Onge wrote: I think pass is fine how it is...


idd

dont fix it if it isnt broken :p

Posted: 08-11-2003 23:36
by R3L!K
maybe your right...

but its not that passing is broken as such, though i think it can be balanced a bit better...

Posted: 08-11-2003 23:46
by Ars3h
i didnt think you were from eng relik :o

Posted: 08-11-2003 23:51
by R3L!K
why not?